Written By Shraddha NS (Grade 10)
Federalism is a system of governance that divides power between a central authority and constituent units. It is implemented differently in various countries, reflecting their unique political, social, and cultural landscapes. India and the United States are both federal nations but have adopted distinct approaches to federalism. India follows a “holding together” federation, while the United States follows a “coming together” federation. This article explores the key differences between these two models and their implications for governance.
India is a vast and diverse country with numerous linguistic, cultural, and regional differences. Its federal system is often characterized as a “holding together” federation. This means that the central government holds significant power and authority, and states are viewed as subordinate entities. The Indian Constitution provides for a strong central government, which controls crucial areas such as defense, foreign affairs, and currency. India’s federalism is characterized by asymmetric power-sharing arrangements. Some states have more autonomy and powers compared to others due to historical and regional considerations. It has a unified judiciary that resolves disputes between the centre and the states. The Supreme Court plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance of power.
The United States, known for its democratic principles and federal structure, follows a “coming together” federation. It was formed through the voluntary union of sovereign states, and the power is shared between the central government and the states. The U.S. Constitution outlines the division of powers between the federal government and the states.
In the U.S. federal structure, both the central government and state governments possess their separate spheres of influence and authority. Powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved for the states. The U.S. Constitution explicitly enumerates the powers of the federal government, ensuring a clear separation of powers between the national and state governments. The U.S. federal system has a dual judiciary, with separate state and federal courts. The Supreme Court acts as the ultimate arbiter on matters of constitutional interpretation and jurisdictional disputes.
The holding together model in India gives more authority to the central government, ensuring stability and unity in a diverse nation. On the other hand, the coming together model in the United States empowers both the central government and states, fostering a sense of shared sovereignty. The coming together model in the United States allows for greater flexibility and experimentation at the state level. States can address local needs and respond to regional differences independently. In contrast, the holding together model in India promotes uniformity and standardization across the country. India’s holding together federation is better suited to managing cultural and linguistic diversity, providing a mechanism for addressing regional aspirations and safeguarding minority interests. The American coming together model places more emphasis on individual rights and limited government intervention.
While both India’s holding together federation and America’s coming together federation are based on federal principles, they exhibit distinct features and serve the specific needs of their respective countries. India’s strong central government promotes unity in diversity, while the United States’ emphasis on shared sovereignty empowers states to address local needs. Understanding these models and their implications is crucial for effective governance and nurturing harmony in federal nations.
Featured Image Courtesy – Legal Bites
